MP
MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS INC (MPWR)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Record Q2 revenue of $664.6M (+31% YoY, +4.2% QoQ) with non-GAAP EPS of $4.21; both exceeded S&P Global consensus: revenue by ~2.4% and EPS by ~$0.09, driven by broad-based strength across end-markets and the initial ramp of AI ASIC power solutions . Estimates from S&P Global; see table footnote.
- Mix and incremental OpEx kept gross margin roughly flat (GAAP 55.1%, non-GAAP 55.5%), while non-GAAP operating margin expanded YoY to 34.8% on scale benefits .
- Q3 guide implies ~8% QoQ growth at the midpoint (revenue $710–$730M), with non-GAAP GM 55.2–55.8% and non-GAAP OpEx $143–$147M; management expects Enterprise Data up 20–30% QoQ in Q3 and further up in Q4 amid AI/customer ramps .
- Stock-reaction catalysts: continued upside from AI ASIC and server ramps, sustained PC/memory share gains, and validation of guidance cadence (Q3 up, Q4 “flattish-to-up” commentary) against short lead-time ordering patterns .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Broad-based growth: 5 of 6 end-markets rose YoY; Storage & Computing up 70% YoY on memory and notebook wins; Automotive +66% YoY; Communications +69% YoY; Consumer +42% YoY; Industrial +45% YoY .
- AI momentum: “We began initial shipments of our power solutions to support our customers’ new ASIC-based AI products,” underscoring diversification beyond the lead GPU customer . CFO added Enterprise Data is “very positive” near- and longer-term amid blurred CPU/AI lines .
- Operating leverage on non-GAAP basis: Operating income up to $231.2M (+35% YoY), non-GAAP EPS to $4.21 (+33% YoY) with tax rate at 15% .
-
What Went Wrong
- Enterprise Data still down YoY (-23%) given last year’s tough comp, despite sequential improvement; concentration there is normalizing as more customers ramp .
- Ordering visibility remains short; management stays “cautiously optimistic” and not building backlog beyond ~two quarters, which tempers near-term conviction, particularly for Q4 pacing .
- GAAP OpEx rose 23% YoY (stock comp and growth investments), pressuring GAAP operating margin QoQ (24.8% vs 26.5% Q1) even as non-GAAP margin improved YoY .
Financial Results
Estimates comparison (S&P Global; asterisk indicates values retrieved from S&P Global)
Segment revenue (YoY and mix)
Key KPIs and Balance Sheet
Non-GAAP adjustments (Q2’25): add-backs included stock-based comp ($60.3M), amortization of intangibles ($0.3M), net deferred comp expense ($0.3M), and related tax effects ($7.6M) .
Guidance Changes
Note: Q3 revenue midpoint (+~8.3% QoQ) aligns with call commentary: Enterprise Data up 20–30% QoQ; most other end-markets up HSD; Storage & Computing “cautious” after strong 1H .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We began initial shipments of our power solutions to support our customers’ new ASIC based AI products.” — Q2 earnings commentary .
- “When we look at Q3, we’ve got enterprise data growing between 20% and 30% sequentially… with the exception of storage and compute, all of our other lines of business are up high single digits.” — CFO .
- “Our current capacity… is to be able to support $4 billion of revenue with diversification of 50% of that outside of China.” — CFO .
- “We continue our transformation from being a chip-only, semiconductor supplier to a full service, silicon-based solutions provider.” — CEO .
Q&A Highlights
- Enterprise Data cadence: Q3 +20–30% QoQ and Q4 up sequentially; still dynamic with short lead times; broader customer base reducing concentration risk .
- Storage & Computing outlook: caution post-strong 1H given historical cyclicality in notebooks/memory despite continued share/content gains .
- Capacity/supply chain: ~$4B rev capacity with ~50% ex-China by year-end; inventories/channel lean; book-to-bill not far above 1 given short-dated ordering .
- Competitive positioning in AI power: engagements span multiple ASIC/GPU programs; mix of single/dual-sourced sockets; emphasis on innovation/time-to-market to secure sockets .
- Long-term auto: 48V and zonal architecture content opportunities; 2H’25 pickup from prior wins; 2026 outlook constructive .
Estimates Context
- Q2 2025 beats: Revenue $664.6M vs $649.3M consensus (+2.4%); Primary EPS $4.21 vs $4.12 (+$0.09). Q1 2025 and Q4 2024 also modest beats on both lines. Values retrieved from S&P Global; see table for details. Actuals reconciled to 8-K and press materials .
- Implications: Upward revisions likely in Enterprise Data for Q3–Q4 given sequential growth commentary; OpEx trajectory and gross margin holding within bands should support stable FY25 non-GAAP EPS frameworks .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Broad-based upside with AI optionality: Continued PC/memory share gains plus accelerating AI ASIC/server ramps create multiple paths to sustain above-consensus growth into H2’25 and 2026 .
- Quality of beats: Revenue/EPS outperformance came with disciplined non-GAAP OpEx and stable margins; non-GAAP operating margin expanded YoY to 34.8% despite investment needs .
- Guidance credibility: Q3 revenue guide (+~8% QoQ midpoint) corroborated by segment color (Enterprise Data +20–30%); watch delivery against short lead-time demand .
- De-risking supply chain: ~$4B capacity, ~50% ex-China by YE supports large AI/customer ramps and geopolitical resilience; lean channel suggests demand is “real” rather than pulled-in .
- Mix watchpoints: Enterprise Data still below prior-year peak; Storage & Computing faces near-term caution after outsized 1H; but Communications optics and Auto content provide offsets .
- Capital returns: Quarterly dividend set at $1.56/share in Q2; balance sheet strength (>$1.1B cash/STI) and robust OCF support ongoing returns and growth capex .
- Stock setup: Catalysts include Q3 print vs guide, visibility into Q4 sequential growth, evidence of AI ASIC/customer ramps broadening, and sustained PC/memory share capture—each a potential re-rating driver given execution track record .
Additional Q2-period items: ECARX strategic partnership (auto/robotics AI collaboration) potentially enhances automotive pipeline and global supply-chain resilience .